Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search

Messages from 128150

Article: 128150
Subject: Re: speed... CORDIC vs. pure arithmetic expression
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:16:16 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

(someone wrote)

>>>x = R*cos(fi)
>>>y = R*sin(fi)

(someone wrote)

> 'fi' is uknown to me, I can compute it with 'gx' & 'gy', since they are 
> vector coordinates. So it would be: atan2(gy,gx).

x=R*gx/sqrt(gx**2+gy**2)
y=R*gy/sqrt(gx**2+gy**2)

two multiplies, a sqrt and two divides should be a lot
easier than atan2, cos, sin.

-- glen


Article: 128151
Subject: help definining a secure SMARTCARD CHIP BASED, USB UNIT
From: onecard <ceo@onecardconnect.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:59:36 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Actualy looking to do usb+microcontroller+cpld or usb+ microcontroller
ip in fpga
LOOKING FOR PARTNERSHIP IN DEVELOPMENT OF THIS UNIT
WWW.ONECARDCONNECT.COM
CEO@ONECARDCONNECT.COM

a couple of good sites

Get your feet wet in the smart card arena

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg245239.html

CLICK ON THE LOWER LINK FOR THE .PDF FOR SOC(SYSTEM ON CHIP) FOR A
SECURE MICROCONTROLLER IN THE LINK BELOW:
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&cluster=2494623305716384420

BELOW IS A SECURITY EVALUATION OF A PHILIPPS SECURE MICROCONTROLLER
www.commoncriteriaportal.org/public/files/epfiles/0312b.pdf


Here are some ip cores (the heart of the secure microcontroller is the
cryptography)


http://www.cryptovision.com/en/products/cryptographic-libraries/cv-actlibrary-vhdl.html

 http://www.ipcores.com/DES1core.htm

 http://www.cryptography.com/technology/dpa/licensing.html


Link below of .pdf of  major attacks that can be done on chips and
what to
do to improve them, the interest being that the smartcard
microcontroller
being secure is of essence.
 http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-630.pdf


Article: 128152
Subject: Re: Basic FPGA question about Reset
From: Allan Herriman <allanherriman@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:26:53 +1100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:22:39 -0800, austin <austin@xilinx.com> wrote:

>G.
>
>How one starts the configuration process is a different problem that how
>the device after configuration, starts up.
>
>The first problem is often caused by people "not trusting" the internal
>Power On Reset circuits in the FPGA:  bad.  We spend an immense amount
>of time making sure the POR circuits work under all sequences, and all
>ramps from 2us to 50ms.  Mess with this, and then you have to do all the
>engineering for three power supplies to make it work at least as well as
>we already did.  Not a smart move.  Why would anyone want to re-invent
>this wheel?

There are a few reasons why you would want to re-invent that wheel in
a practical product:

1.  "all ramps from 2us to 50ms"  
It may be impossible to guarantee the 50ms end of that, particularly
in mains powered circuits.  If there is a slow brownout, an external
reset generator with accurate thresholds *will* result in a more
reliable design.

2.  I find that my designs rarely contain just an FPGA.  I have a
whole host (sorry about the pun) of items on the board that need to be
reset at the same time.

2b.  Sometimes (particularly when I have a host processor on the board
that configures the FPGA) I want to have different parts of the board
reset based on different criteria.

3.  I also have extra voltage rails that need to be monitored, and
these rails aren't connected to the FPGA.  An external reset generator
is required to monitor those rails.


If FPGAs had an on-die reset generator that
- was guaranteed to work for all ramp rates
- was guaranteed to work for non-monotonic ramps
- could monitor 3-4 additional voltages
- had a guaranteed 2% voltage tolerance or better
- had threshold voltages I can set (or determine by resistor ratios)
- had a dedicated reset output to drive other parts of the board,

I would use it.  Until then, I will use cheap, reliable, external
reset generator devices.


Regards,
Allan


>After the product has loaded the configuration, and has completed the
>start-up sequence, then everything is in a known state, so a reset isn't
>even required (it is implicit in the starting values you placed in the
>registers in your VHDL or verilog code, and was part of the loaded
>bitstream).
>
>If at some time later, you want to return to a 'known good state', which
>we will call "reset" for no better reason than it describes the action
>you want to take, then the applications note (or the old Tech X) details
>all kinds of ways to do this, that work.
>
>Austin

Article: 128153
Subject: Re: Quartus II Incremental compilation?
From: Anuja <thakkar.anuja@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Jan 16, 8:44=A0am, KJ <kkjenni...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Jan 16, 8:19=A0am, Anuja <thakkar.an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The Quartus II handbook says that its Incremental compilation feature
> > has the ability to iterate rapidly during the design and debugging
> > stages. What exactly does this mean?
>
> It means that your build times using Quartus will be quicker because
> it won't redo things that haven't changed. =A0So instead of a 20 minute
> build, maybe it takes only 2.
>
> > Is this feature similar to Partial Reconfiguration offered by Xilinx?
>
> They are entirely different things.
>
> KJ

Thanks buddy. You are of great help.

Article: 128154
Subject: Re: Complex Multiply
From: Ann <thakkar.anuja@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:29:33 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Jan 15, 7:32=A0am, KJ <kkjenni...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Slight correction to previous post. =A0Instead of
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0RetVal.Real :=3D (a.real * b.real - a.imag * b.imag)(a'range);
> =A0 =A0 =A0RetVal.Imag :=3D (a.real * b.imag + b.real * a.imag)(a'range);
>
> It should be
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0RetVal.Real :=3D (a.real * b.real - a.imag * b.imag)
> (a.real'range);
> =A0 =A0 =A0RetVal.Imag :=3D (a.real * b.imag + b.real * a.imag)
> (a.imag'range);
>
> KJ

Thanks a bunch. I will try this out.

Article: 128155
Subject: Re: Basic FPGA question about Reset
From: Allan Herriman <allanherriman@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:54:11 +1100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:26:53 +1100, Allan Herriman
<allanherriman@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:22:39 -0800, austin <austin@xilinx.com> wrote:
>
>>G.
>>
>>How one starts the configuration process is a different problem that how
>>the device after configuration, starts up.
>>
>>The first problem is often caused by people "not trusting" the internal
>>Power On Reset circuits in the FPGA:  bad.  We spend an immense amount
>>of time making sure the POR circuits work under all sequences, and all
>>ramps from 2us to 50ms.  Mess with this, and then you have to do all the
>>engineering for three power supplies to make it work at least as well as
>>we already did.  Not a smart move.  Why would anyone want to re-invent
>>this wheel?
>
>There are a few reasons why you would want to re-invent that wheel in
>a practical product:
>
>1.  "all ramps from 2us to 50ms"  
>It may be impossible to guarantee the 50ms end of that, particularly
>in mains powered circuits.  If there is a slow brownout, an external
>reset generator with accurate thresholds *will* result in a more
>reliable design.
>
>2.  I find that my designs rarely contain just an FPGA.  I have a
>whole host (sorry about the pun) of items on the board that need to be
>reset at the same time.
>
>2b.  Sometimes (particularly when I have a host processor on the board
>that configures the FPGA) I want to have different parts of the board
>reset based on different criteria.
>
>3.  I also have extra voltage rails that need to be monitored, and
>these rails aren't connected to the FPGA.  An external reset generator
>is required to monitor those rails.
>
>
>If FPGAs had an on-die reset generator that
>- was guaranteed to work for all ramp rates
>- was guaranteed to work for non-monotonic ramps
>- could monitor 3-4 additional voltages
>- had a guaranteed 2% voltage tolerance or better
>- had threshold voltages I can set (or determine by resistor ratios)
>- had a dedicated reset output to drive other parts of the board,
>
>I would use it.  Until then, I will use cheap, reliable, external
>reset generator devices.
>
>
>Regards,
>Allan

P.S.  I apologise if that sounded overly critical.  Still, I think my
points are valid for the sorts of boards I design.

Regards,
Allan

Article: 128156
Subject: CynApps Cynlib
From: Amal <akhailtash@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Does anyone have a copy of Forte Design (CynApps) opensource Cynlib?

I appreciate if you can send me a copy.
-- Amal

Article: 128157
Subject: Re: Quartus II Incremental compilation?
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:34:21 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

On Jan 16, 8:44 am, KJ <kkjenni...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>On Jan 16, 8:19 am, Anuja <thakkar.an...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>The Quartus II handbook says that its Incremental compilation feature
>>has the ability to iterate rapidly during the design and debugging
>>stages. What exactly does this mean?

>It means that your build times using Quartus will be quicker because
>it won't redo things that haven't changed.  So instead of a 20 minute
>build, maybe it takes only 2.

>>Is this feature similar to Partial Reconfiguration offered by Xilinx?

>They are entirely different things.

Maybe not.

Partial reconfiguration might involve rerunning Quartus to
compile a new design.  Incremental compilation would speed up
the process, and also guarantee that the part that wasn't
supposed to change actually didn't change.  (Or at least make
it more likely.)

-- glen


Article: 128158
Subject: effect of xray on fpga electronic circuits
From: recoder <kurtulmehtap@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:03:05 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Dear All,
 As an assignment I have to design a CCD Sensor based FPGA digital
Camera. However, the Camera will be exposed to XRAY (It will be placed
behind an Imaging Intensifier). Does anybody know how XRAY affects the
electronic circuits (The CCD Sensor and the FPGA ). What type of noise
should I expect and what should I do to prevent it.
 Thanks in advance

Article: 128159
Subject: Re: Basic FPGA question about Reset
From: hal-usenet@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Hal Murray)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:55:56 -0600
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
>1.  "all ramps from 2us to 50ms"
>It may be impossible to guarantee the 50ms end of that, particularly
>in mains powered circuits.  If there is a slow brownout, an external
>reset generator with accurate thresholds *will* result in a more
>reliable design.

That's the reason that jumped out at me.

There is an easy way to get ugly brownouts.  Just turn a system back
on shortly after you turn it off.  (Been there, done that.)

Brownouts are ugly.  Basically, you need the power-watcher system
to generate a reset before the power goes out of spec.
The power-up reset generator just doesn't cover that.

-- 
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.


Article: 128160
Subject: Re: Documentation on Insight VIRTEX-E Reference Board
From: John Adair <g1@enterpoint.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:03:56 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Paul

A long shot - try talking to your local Avnet/Silica as Avnet took
over Insight Memec a couple of years ago. Memec in it's various forms
did a lot of development boards.

John Adair
Enterpoint Ltd. - Home of Drigmorn1. The Low Cost FPGA Development
Board.

On 16 Jan, 21:04, Paul Price <p...@logicvision.com> wrote:
> We are using a number of these boards but do not have the
> documentation for them and need to make some changes. =A0Any information
> on where we could get the userguide would be welcomed. =A0We've tried
> contacting a number of different vendors, etc. with no luck
>
> The markings on the board
>
> Insight
> VIRTEX-E REFERENCE BOARD
> PART # =A0 =A0:_________ REV-B
> SERIAL # : __________
>
> Both the part # and Serial # are blank
>
> It uses a Virtex XCV600E FPGA


Article: 128161
Subject: Re: effect of xray on fpga electronic circuits
From: Jon Beniston <jon@beniston.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:00:15 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 17 Jan, 08:03, recoder <kurtulmeh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
> =A0As an assignment I have to design a CCD Sensor based FPGA digital
> Camera. However, the Camera will be exposed to XRAY (It will be placed
> behind an Imaging Intensifier). Does anybody know how XRAY affects the
> electronic circuits (The CCD Sensor and the FPGA ). What type of noise
> should I expect and what should I do to prevent it.
> =A0Thanks in advance

Can bits be flipped?

Do you need a RadHard FPGA?

Cheers,
Jon

Article: 128162
Subject: Re: effect of xray on fpga electronic circuits
From: "RCIngham" <robert.ingham@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:13:24 -0600
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
>Dear All,
> As an assignment I have to design a CCD Sensor based FPGA digital
>Camera. However, the Camera will be exposed to XRAY (It will be placed
>behind an Imaging Intensifier). Does anybody know how XRAY affects the
>electronic circuits (The CCD Sensor and the FPGA ). What type of noise
>should I expect and what should I do to prevent it.
> Thanks in advance
>

How about:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22effects+of+x-rays%22+%22electronic+circuits%22

Advice - buy "Space Class" devices. This will probably be from Actel.


Article: 128163
Subject: Re: effect of xray on fpga electronic circuits
From: EdV <ed_vogel@my-deja.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Jan 17, 2:03=A0am, recoder <kurtulmeh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
> =A0As an assignment I have to design a CCD Sensor based FPGA digital
> Camera. However, the Camera will be exposed to XRAY (It will be placed
> behind an Imaging Intensifier). Does anybody know how XRAY affects the
> electronic circuits (The CCD Sensor and the FPGA ). What type of noise
> should I expect and what should I do to prevent it.
> =A0Thanks in advance

A little bit of lead foil goes a long way.  Depends on how much XRAY I
imagine.  Be careful.

Article: 128164
Subject: Re: effect of xray on fpga electronic circuits
From: John_H <newsgroup@johnhandwork.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:08:43 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
recoder wrote:
> Dear All,
>  As an assignment I have to design a CCD Sensor based FPGA digital
> Camera. However, the Camera will be exposed to XRAY (It will be placed
> behind an Imaging Intensifier). Does anybody know how XRAY affects the
> electronic circuits (The CCD Sensor and the FPGA ). What type of noise
> should I expect and what should I do to prevent it.
>  Thanks in advance

Ever consider using a phosphor plate to turn the x-rays into visible 
light first?

Article: 128165
Subject: Re: effect of xray on fpga electronic circuits
From: "Symon" <symon_brewer@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:00:06 -0000
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
"John_H" <newsgroup@johnhandwork.com> wrote in message 
news:tJmdnUfZyuv8_BLanZ2dnUVZ_tjinZ2d@comcast.com...
> recoder wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>  As an assignment I have to design a CCD Sensor based FPGA digital
>> Camera. However, the Camera will be exposed to XRAY (It will be placed
>> behind an Imaging Intensifier). Does anybody know how XRAY affects the
>> electronic circuits (The CCD Sensor and the FPGA ). What type of noise
>> should I expect and what should I do to prevent it.
>>  Thanks in advance
>
> Ever consider using a phosphor plate to turn the x-rays into visible light 
> first?

Hi John,
I guess that's what the OP means.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_image_intensifier
Maybe! I would've thought that would stop the X-rays. I guess Austin will 
give his SEU spiel soon. That'll teach the OP! ;-)
Cheers, Syms. 



Article: 128166
Subject: Re: Basic FPGA question about Reset
From: austin <austin@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:45:27 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Allan,

OK, I do not disagree.  I just wished to point out that we have already
done an immense amount of work, and the only reasons why you would need
an external reset are those you bring up.

Austin

Article: 128167
Subject: Re: Basic FPGA question about Reset
From: austin <austin@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:49:24 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hall,

Good point:  we do cover some brown-out, but that can only be done only
so well (there is no way to be precise enough to cover all possible
brown-out scenarios).

There are power supply regulator chips that provide a "power good"
signal, and if brown-out is possible (as in: you can not specify your
primary power supply quality) then you will need a "power good" signal
from your power supply.

See "power central" for vendors that Xilinx approves, and works with.
Many of these have products with "power good" features.

http://www.xilinx.com/products/design_resources/power_central/

Austin

Article: 128168
Subject: Re: effect of xray on fpga electronic circuits
From: austin <austin@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:56:56 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
X-ray,

Has no effect on the device, except that (eventually) the total dose
will accumulate, and the Vt of the devices will begin to shift, and
eventually, the device will fail.

This is unlike a CCD, which may register 'hits' and display noise.

Only neutrons, or protons, with LET of 1 Mev have enough energy to
create charge clouds, and change bits:

http://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon_solutions/market_specific_devices/aero_def/capabilities/aero_def_app.htm

Contact your local Xilinx FAE to find out about X-Ray dose (how long it
can "take it.").

At some dose level, that usage becomes ITAR restricted (people use stuff
this hard to build nuclear bombs, or operate in the presence of nuclear
explosions) so you will no longer be able to buy, or use, such parts,
unless the US State Department permits you to do so.

I suspect for your application, our commercial parts are more that
"hard" enough.

X-rays, after all, are just photons, and they just do not pack enough
energy to affect even the MGTs in our parts, and certainly do not affect
the logic and memory.

Austin

Article: 128169
Subject: Re: effect of xray on fpga electronic circuits
From: austin <austin@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:59:12 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Spiel?

X-rays are just wimpy little photons ....

SEUs are caused by cosmic rays (heavy ions, like iron, gold, etc with
LET's of > 100 MeV) that create neutron showers with energies beyond
1000 MeV.

Austin

Article: 128170
Subject: Re: CynApps Cynlib
From: Uncle Noah <nkavv@skiathos.physics.auth.gr>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Jan 17, 5:59 am, Amal <akhailt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have a copy of Forte Design (CynApps) opensource Cynlib?
>
> I appreciate if you can send me a copy.
> -- Amal

Hi

i have this one: cynlib.1.2.1.source.tar.gz (3,876,003bytes)

I'll check the licensing issues (if i can pass it to you or not). But,
first of all, is this version OK for you?

And what about the company, it might be best if you asked them about
the legality of this.

Kind regards
Nikolaos Kavvadias

Article: 128171
Subject: Re: Documentation on Insight VIRTEX-E Reference Board
From: Bryan <bryan.fletcher@avnet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:47:16 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Jan 17, 2:03 am, John Adair <g...@enterpoint.co.uk> wrote:
> Paul
>
> A long shot - try talking to your local Avnet/Silica as Avnet took
> over Insight Memec a couple of years ago. Memec in it's various forms
> did a lot of development boards.
>
> John Adair
> Enterpoint Ltd. - Home of Drigmorn1. The Low Cost FPGA Development
> Board.
>
> On 16 Jan, 21:04, Paul Price <p...@logicvision.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > We are using a number of these boards but do not have the
> > documentation for them and need to make some changes.  Any information
> > on where we could get the userguide would be welcomed.  We've tried
> > contacting a number of different vendors, etc. with no luck
>
> > The markings on the board
>
> > Insight
> > VIRTEX-E REFERENCE BOARD
> > PART #    :_________ REV-B
> > SERIAL # : __________
>
> > Both the part # and Serial # are blank
>
> > It uses a Virtex XCV600E FPGA- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Speaking to your Avnet/Silica FAE is a good idea.  Another option is
to visit the Avnet Design Resource Center, which archives
documentation and reference designs for all of the Avnet and Memec
boards, even the obsolete ones, like this one.

Go to www.em.avnet.com/drc then select SUPPORT FILES AND DOWNLOADS
button.  Select Xilinx as the manufacturer.  Scroll to find the
Xilinx(R) Virtex(tm)-E Development Kit and click the page symbol on the
right.

https://www.em.avnet.com/common/filetree/0,2740,RID%253D0%2526CID%253D4908%2526CCD%253DUSA%2526SID%253D32214%2526DID%253DDF2%2526LID%253D32232%2526PVW%253D%2526PNT%253D%2526BID%253DDF2%2526CTP%253DSTA,00.html

Bryan

Article: 128172
Subject: Re: effect of xray on fpga electronic circuits
From: linnix <me@linnix.info-for.us>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:26:55 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Jan 17, 12:03 am, recoder <kurtulmeh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>  As an assignment I have to design a CCD Sensor based FPGA digital
> Camera. However, the Camera will be exposed to XRAY (It will be placed
> behind an Imaging Intensifier). Does anybody know how XRAY affects the
> electronic circuits (The CCD Sensor and the FPGA ). What type of noise
> should I expect and what should I do to prevent it.
>  Thanks in advance

Is it internal flash or external flash?  If anything, flash would be
the weakest link.

Article: 128173
Subject: Chipscope compatible with Synopsis or Cadence sythesise tools?
From: Philipp <Philipp_G@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:39:52 +0000
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hi

I have an VHDL core that is sythesizeable with the following tools

   Synopsys Design Compiler
   Cadence Encounter RTL Compiler

Until now I was using XST for sythesis and it seems when I try to run 
sythesis for the VHDL core with XST I get a bunch of errors. The 
convenient thing with Xilinx was the Chipscope which allows the on-chip
debugging. So I wonder if the tools mentioned at the beginning also 
support this kind of on-ship debugging? Or could I sythesise the design 
with the ICON and ILA with the Synopsis or Cadence RTL compiler and then 
use CHIPscope. Does anyone have tried that?

Many thanks
Philipp

Article: 128174
Subject: Re: Chipscope compatible with Synopsis or Cadence sythesise tools?
From: Jon Beniston <jon@beniston.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 17 Jan, 18:39, Philipp <Philip...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have an VHDL core that is sythesizeable with the following tools
>
> =A0 =A0Synopsys Design Compiler
> =A0 =A0Cadence Encounter RTL Compiler
>
> Until now I was using XST for sythesis and it seems when I try to run
> sythesis for the VHDL core with XST I get a bunch of errors. The
> convenient thing with Xilinx was the Chipscope which allows the on-chip
> debugging. So I wonder if the tools mentioned at the beginning also
> support this kind of on-ship debugging? Or could I sythesise the design
> with the ICON and ILA with the Synopsis or Cadence RTL compiler and then
> use CHIPscope. Does anyone have tried that?

Do you have Xilinx .libs for DC or RC?

Cheers,
Jon



Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search