Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search

Messages from 150450

Article: 150450
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:10:27 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:03:16 -0600, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

>On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:20:55 -0800, John Larkin
><jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212400/Xilinx-to-shutter-French-R-D-operation
>>
>>Yikes, this explains some stuff. I wonder how long it will take to
>>undo the damage. 
>
>Damage?  The damage caused by closing a software development lab?

I meant the damage likely *done* by that lab. We'd been speculating
how Xininx managed to snarl up their software so thoroughly, and
whether they will ever get it fixed. I can't imagine why they'd
outsource something this important to France.


  Given their
>software, it's probably a good thing.  I just tried downloading their 12.4
>software last week.

As in "all of last week"?

  It wouldn't even install.  The Avnet folks got me a DVD,
>so I'll probably try that next week.
>
>>Our latest projects are using Altera parts, purely
>>because the Xilinx software is such a train wreck.
>
>I'm using a Xilinx Coolrunner part for a very simple application, mostly
>because they have package better suited to the application and our SMT line
>(small and not a CsBGA).  ISE WebPack 11.1 works reasonably well but I'm not
>pushing it very hard (32 flops and a half dozen I/O @ 14.7456MHz clock isn't
>much of a stretch ;-).  

Yeah, CPLDs don't need a lot of place-and-route effort.

John


Article: 150451
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:27:40 -0600
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:10:27 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:03:16 -0600, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:20:55 -0800, John Larkin
>><jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212400/Xilinx-to-shutter-French-R-D-operation
>>>
>>>Yikes, this explains some stuff. I wonder how long it will take to
>>>undo the damage. 
>>
>>Damage?  The damage caused by closing a software development lab?
>
>I meant the damage likely *done* by that lab. We'd been speculating
>how Xininx managed to snarl up their software so thoroughly, and
>whether they will ever get it fixed. I can't imagine why they'd
>outsource something this important to France.

I don't know why anyone would do business in France (or most of Europe), given
their work rules.

>  Given their
>>software, it's probably a good thing.  I just tried downloading their 12.4
>>software last week.
>
>As in "all of last week"?

It took two days to download it, at home (I'd be strung up if I did it at
work) and another couple of days to try to get it installed.  It comes as a
.TAR file, which is really useful on a PC.

>  It wouldn't even install.  The Avnet folks got me a DVD,
>>so I'll probably try that next week.
>>
>>>Our latest projects are using Altera parts, purely
>>>because the Xilinx software is such a train wreck.
>>
>>I'm using a Xilinx Coolrunner part for a very simple application, mostly
>>because they have package better suited to the application and our SMT line
>>(small and not a CsBGA).  ISE WebPack 11.1 works reasonably well but I'm not
>>pushing it very hard (32 flops and a half dozen I/O @ 14.7456MHz clock isn't
>>much of a stretch ;-).  
>
>Yeah, CPLDs don't need a lot of place-and-route effort.

OTOH, I don't seem much difference in what Altera calls a CPLD (Max-II/V) and
an FPGA.  

Article: 150452
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:49:25 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
John Larkin wrote:

>...We'd been speculating
> how Xininx managed to snarl up their software so thoroughly,...

cf. MICRO$~1

Cheers!
Rich


Article: 150453
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "HT-Lab" <hans64@ht-lab.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:00:51 -0000
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message 
news:6ndnj6taqep5e1fno3cj0gkcehv892m018@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:03:16 -0600, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
> <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:20:55 -0800, John Larkin
>><jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212400/Xilinx-to-shutter-French-R-D-operation
>>>
>>>Yikes, this explains some stuff. I wonder how long it will take to
>>>undo the damage.
>>
>>Damage?  The damage caused by closing a software development lab?
>
> I meant the damage likely *done* by that lab. We'd been speculating
> how Xininx managed to snarl up their software so thoroughly, and

> I can't imagine why they'd outsource something this important to France.

Me neither, don't they know that all brilliant programmers are in the US!

Hans
www.ht-lab.com





Article: 150454
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:50:48 +1100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>


** You are a total cunt and a massive liar.



.... Phil 



Article: 150455
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:51:12 +1100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>


** You are a total cunt and a massive liar.



.... Phil




Article: 150456
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "F. Bertolazzi" <TOGLIeset@MAIUSCOLEtdd.it>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:47:52 +0100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz:

> I don't know why anyone would do business in France (or most of Europe), given
> their work rules.

If the State owns the bigger electronics & defence companies ad it is a
chauvinist (french world...) nation, the best way to sell them stuff is to
have a non purely commercial operation there.

Article: 150457
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 10:29:53 -0600
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:51:12 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote:

>
><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
>
>
>** You are a total cunt and a massive liar.

Why thank you, Phyllis.  That's the nicest thing you've ever said to anyone
here.

Article: 150458
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 10:31:27 -0600
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:47:52 +0100, "F. Bertolazzi"
<TOGLIeset@MAIUSCOLEtdd.it> wrote:

>krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz:
>
>> I don't know why anyone would do business in France (or most of Europe), given
>> their work rules.
>
>If the State owns the bigger electronics & defence companies ad it is a
>chauvinist (french world...) nation, the best way to sell them stuff is to
>have a non purely commercial operation there.

What is a "non purely commercial operation"?  Does this pay for the costs
they're going to incur when closing the operation down?

Article: 150459
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 10:33:04 -0600
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:50:48 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote:

>
><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
>
>
>** You are a total cunt and a massive liar.

It's so nice of you to add what you can to the group, Phyllis.  Now run along
and play with Dimmie.

Article: 150460
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:15:55 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:51:12 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au>
wrote:

>
><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
>
>
>** You are a total cunt and a massive liar.
>
>
>
>.... Phil
>
>

Now *that's* beginning to sound like proper misogyny.

John


Article: 150461
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "F. Bertolazzi" <TOGLIeset@MAIUSCOLEtdd.it>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:08:00 +0100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz:

> What is a "non purely commercial operation"? 

A factory or an R&D center.

> Does this pay for the costs they're going to incur when closing the
> operation down?

Well, given that Europe accounts for 20% of their revenues and North
America for 32%, probably wthey could have laid off somebody in the US.

Article: 150462
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 12:53:56 -0600
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:15:55 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:51:12 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au>
>wrote:
>
>>
>><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
>>
>>
>>** You are a total cunt and a massive liar.
>>
>>
>>
>>.... Phil
>>
>>
>
>Now *that's* beginning to sound like proper misogyny.

---
PKB?

---
JF

Article: 150463
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: james <bubba@bud.u>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:14:50 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:27:40 -0600, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

|I don't know why anyone would do business in France (or most of Europe), given
|their work rules.


Possible local content requirements? 

james

Article: 150464
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: nico@puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel)
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:52:33 GMT
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

>On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:10:27 -0800, John Larkin
><jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:03:16 -0600, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:20:55 -0800, John Larkin
>>><jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212400/Xilinx-to-shutter-French-R-D-operation
>>>>
>>>>Yikes, this explains some stuff. I wonder how long it will take to
>>>>undo the damage. 
>>>
>>>Damage?  The damage caused by closing a software development lab?
>>
>>I meant the damage likely *done* by that lab. We'd been speculating
>>how Xininx managed to snarl up their software so thoroughly, and
>>whether they will ever get it fixed. I can't imagine why they'd
>>outsource something this important to France.
>
>I don't know why anyone would do business in France (or most of Europe), given
>their work rules.

Says someone from a country where unions are (almost) mandatory...
Talk about work rules. Still, the French are not known for excellent
engineering. Eiffel has been dead for a long time.

-- 
Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply
indicates you are not using the right tools...
nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.)
--------------------------------------------------------------

Article: 150465
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:32:44 -0600
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:52:33 GMT, nico@puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel) wrote:

>"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:10:27 -0800, John Larkin
>><jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:03:16 -0600, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>>><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:20:55 -0800, John Larkin
>>>><jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212400/Xilinx-to-shutter-French-R-D-operation
>>>>>
>>>>>Yikes, this explains some stuff. I wonder how long it will take to
>>>>>undo the damage. 
>>>>
>>>>Damage?  The damage caused by closing a software development lab?
>>>
>>>I meant the damage likely *done* by that lab. We'd been speculating
>>>how Xininx managed to snarl up their software so thoroughly, and
>>>whether they will ever get it fixed. I can't imagine why they'd
>>>outsource something this important to France.
>>
>>I don't know why anyone would do business in France (or most of Europe), given
>>their work rules.
>
>Says someone from a country where unions are (almost) mandatory...

A damned lie, except, perhaps, WRT government jobs.  Twenty two states are
"right to work" states, where one cannot be forced to join a union even though
it is a "union shop". Fewer than one in twelve US private sector jobs are
unionized (OTOH, more than one three government workers are - a real problem).
Exceedingly few high-tech (engineering) jobs are union. 

But why should we expect other than lies from a Europeon leftist loon.

>Talk about work rules. Still, the French are not known for excellent
>engineering. Eiffel has been dead for a long time.

Article: 150466
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:35:19 +1100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>


** You are a total cunthead and a massive liar.




.... Phil





Article: 150467
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:36:15 -0600
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:35:19 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote:

>
><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
>
>
>** You are a total cunthead and a massive liar.
>
You already said that Phyllis.  You're not adding anything to the group now.


Article: 150468
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:40:41 +1100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>


<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>


** You are a total cunthead and a massive liar.

   Get off SED.


.... Phil






Article: 150469
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:50:08 -0600
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:40:41 +1100, "Phil Allison" <phil_a@tpg.com.au> wrote:

>
>
><krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
>
>
>** You are a total cunthead and a massive liar.

Phyllis, your needle is stuck.

>   Get off SED.

Not a chance, Phyllis,


Article: 150470
Subject: Re: Overview for non-technicals.
From: Cees Binkhorst <cees@binkhorst.xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:40:35 +0100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Serendipity over the week-end brought this:
http://www.ccm.nl/pdf/SAXCS-UK.pdf
http://www.cybernet.co.jp/fclib/documents/example/03_MBD_Controller.pdf

Excellent examples of what I meant to say ;)

Regards / Cees

On 01/21/2011 10:47 AM, Cees Binkhorst wrote:
> Have a look at http://www.mathworks.com/ and search (top-right corner)
> with 'fpga' to get almost 900 leads for further reading.
> 
> There are also high-level optimization war-stories on
> http://www.mathworks.com/solutions/
> 
> Regards / Cees
> 
> On 01/20/2011 11:11 AM, rupertlssmith@googlemail.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've googled about a bit, but not found the perfect answer yet. Does
>> anyone have any suggestions for reading material (paper or web), that
>> would serve as an introductory overview of FPGAs for non-technical
>> managers? Something that gives a rough idea of what typically can and
>> cannot be achieved in hardware, and a sense of the difficulties and
>> effort required to do so. Thats probably a lot to ask, but if you know
>> of any good introductions, I would appreciate a link.
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>> Rupert
> 


Article: 150471
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:09:42 +0100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 23/01/2011 06:10, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:03:16 -0600, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
> <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>  wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:20:55 -0800, John Larkin
>> <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212400/Xilinx-to-shutter-French-R-D-operation
>>>
>>> Yikes, this explains some stuff. I wonder how long it will take to
>>> undo the damage.
>>
>> Damage?  The damage caused by closing a software development lab?
>
> I meant the damage likely *done* by that lab. We'd been speculating
> how Xininx managed to snarl up their software so thoroughly, and
> whether they will ever get it fixed. I can't imagine why they'd
> outsource something this important to France.
>

I find it hard to believe that supposedly educated, intelligent and 
experienced engineers can post such ignorant xenophobic drivel.

Xilinx (or rather, their users and customers) have trouble with the 
Xilinx software because the Xilinx leadership do not prioritise it 
appropriately, and (apparently) do not listen to or understand the 
issues customers have with the software.  They alone are at fault.  It 
could well be that the main management fault was to hire a development 
team that was not competent to do the development - but the problem is 
their lack of competence, not their nationality!

I know that sci.electronics.design is a hangout for mostly geriatric 
American right-wingers who like to spend their free time blaming the 
world's ills on "leftist weenies", foreigners, atheists, intellectuals, 
and other dangerous sub-humans.  That's fair enough, within the limits 
of freedom of speech.  It can even be entertaining at times.  But please 
keep that sort of thing within s.e.d. and not serious newsgroups.

Follow-up flames to s.e.d., and leave c.a.f. alone for a possible 
discussion about the actual effect of this news on Xilinx and its customers.

Article: 150472
Subject: Re: Prime number testing on FPGA
From: Kolja Sulimma <ksulimma@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:31:51 -0800 (PST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 20 Jan., 08:10, Dennis Yurichev <dennis.yuric...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are another number primality tests exists, so the question is,
> is there can be such primality test which is suitable for FPGA in such
> way, when it will work much more effectively than =C9douard Lucas and
> Derrick Henry Lehmer's primality test running on generic computer?

I can't compare the performance, but the reconfigurable computing
people
from imperial collage have been working on that:
http://wwwhomes.doc.ic.ac.uk/~rcheung/papers/fpt04.pdf

Kolja

Article: 150473
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:21:27 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:09:42 +0100, David Brown
<david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> wrote:

>On 23/01/2011 06:10, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:03:16 -0600, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>> <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>  wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:20:55 -0800, John Larkin
>>> <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212400/Xilinx-to-shutter-French-R-D-operation
>>>>
>>>> Yikes, this explains some stuff. I wonder how long it will take to
>>>> undo the damage.
>>>
>>> Damage?  The damage caused by closing a software development lab?
>>
>> I meant the damage likely *done* by that lab. We'd been speculating
>> how Xininx managed to snarl up their software so thoroughly, and
>> whether they will ever get it fixed. I can't imagine why they'd
>> outsource something this important to France.
>>
>
>I find it hard to believe that supposedly educated, intelligent and 
>experienced engineers can post such ignorant xenophobic drivel.

Well, two facts exist:

1. Their software is a nightmare, and it's costing them business

2. They are dumping the French operation.

The software is the heart of an FPGA company. The very architecture of
the chip has to be coordinated with possible compiler strategies. The
idea of outsourcing anything this important to a group 8 or 9 time
zones away, working in another language, in a country where it's
almost impossible to fire incompetant workers, where people take long
lunches with wine and don't work weekends, just amazes me.

>
>Xilinx (or rather, their users and customers) have trouble with the 
>Xilinx software because the Xilinx leadership do not prioritise it 
>appropriately, and (apparently) do not listen to or understand the 
>issues customers have with the software.  They alone are at fault.  It 
>could well be that the main management fault was to hire a development 
>team that was not competent to do the development - but the problem is 
>their lack of competence, not their nationality!

I'd have been equally surprised had they outsourced anything this
core-critical to any other country that far from San Jose. Big
Software is nearly impossible to manage even without an ocean in the
way.


>
>I know that sci.electronics.design is a hangout for mostly geriatric 
>American right-wingers who like to spend their free time blaming the 
>world's ills on "leftist weenies", foreigners, atheists, intellectuals, 
>and other dangerous sub-humans. 

Jim isn't typical.

John


Article: 150474
Subject: Re: Xilinx news
From: "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:30:17 -0800
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message 
news:4gcrj690ue2un4cu7d0fen5vjcq43pci6l@4ax.com...
> The software is the heart of an FPGA company.

Glad to know I'm not the only one who thought the first response to that 
article:

"Xilinx sell hardware, software especially high level tools is secondary."

...was a bit clueless!




Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search