Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search

Messages from 152800

Article: 152800
Subject: Re: Spartan changes in glitch sensitivity
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:57:28 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote:

(snip)
> I know what I was forced to do broke all the digital rules, but it was
> necessary to make the analog part work.

Maybe not all of them.  While most of the modern rules are based
on synchronous logic, asynchronous (sometimes called self-timed)
logic is still around, with its own, different, rules.

-- glen

Article: 152801
Subject: Re: Patent Reform Town Hall Meeting (Balt/Washington Area IEEE Consultants Network)
From: Paul Gotch <paulg@at-cantab-dot.net>
Date: 24 Oct 2011 23:20:39 +0100 (BST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
In comp.arch.embedded Mark Wills <forthfreak@forthfiles.net> wrote:
> In what have congress changed the law?

The main ones are:

- A move to first to file rather than first to invent (which brings the
US into line with most of the rest of the world).

- Allowing the USPTOs to set its own fees in a way that in aggregate
covers its own costs.

- A mechanism to allow thirdparty submission of prior art subsequent to
publication of the patent.

Unfortunately the bill does almost nothing to combat trolls nor does it
get rid of the treble damages on wilful infringement setup.

-p
-- 
Paul Gotch
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Article: 152802
Subject: Re: Patent Reform Town Hall Meeting (Balt/Washington Area IEEE Consultants Network)
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:34:34 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
In comp.dsp Paul Gotch <paulg@at-cantab-dot.net> wrote:

(snip on patent rule changes)

> Unfortunately the bill does almost nothing to combat trolls nor does it
> get rid of the treble damages on wilful infringement setup.

As I understand it (not very well), though, it does remove the
submarine patent.  Isn't it now some number of years from filing,
instead of from approval?

-- glen

Article: 152803
Subject: Re: Patent Reform Town Hall Meeting (Balt/Washington Area IEEE Consultants Network)
From: Paul Gotch <paulg@at-cantab-dot.net>
Date: 25 Oct 2011 01:04:12 +0100 (BST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
In comp.arch.embedded glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> As I understand it (not very well), though, it does remove the
> submarine patent.  Isn't it now some number of years from filing,
> instead of from approval?

That one was fixed through a combination of a 1995 WTO treaty which
change the term to start from the day of filing not the day of grant
combined with a change in 2000(?) to publish most patents after 18
months rather than keeping them secret until they were granted.

Together they mean that there is no benefit in terms of term in
pushing the date of issuance into the future and that the patent will
almost certainly be published before it is granted.

-p
-- 
Paul Gotch
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Article: 152804
Subject: Re: Patent Reform Town Hall Meeting (Balt/Washington Area IEEE
From: ashtonrsmiller <rmiller@storm.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Oct 24, 3:59=A0pm, rickman <gnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> We are still looking for a panelist who is a consultant able to speak
> regarding the impact of this new law. =A0Anyone available in the area?

I believe he is retired now but John D. Trudell was a knowledgeable
and active campaigner against the changes made in 1999, which also
favored the corporations at the expense of the individual inventor.
His website isn't being maintained, but hopefully he might be willing
to participate.

http://www.trudelgroup.com/pwars.htm

Article: 152805
Subject: Re: Peter Alfke has passed away
From: Suhaib Fahmy <suhaib@fahmy.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
An email from some relatives was posted on a similar thread I made on
LinkedIn, that confirms he passed away in July as a result of his
illness.

Sad=85

Article: 152806
Subject: microprocessor design with vhdl
From: VIJAY KUMAR <jvkphysics@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hello,i have knowledge of  basic  vhdl and i have implement a few
fundemental programs on digital circuits. Iam very new to FPGA.I want
to experiment a complete details of microprocessor design with FPGA
using VHDL language.starting with writing the coding.

Article: 152807
Subject: ADC by using counter method on FPGA using VHDL language
From: VIJAY KUMAR <jvkphysics@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hello,i have some idea about vhdl.I want coding  of ADC by using
counter method on FPGA by using VHDL.. I know the some idea about this
program the following process.
a) first reset the counter
b)the references and analog voltages are equal then gate can be
closed.then the the value can be stored in the couters i.e., the value
in counter is equavalent to digital value to analog input.
 I want coding the above two steps

Article: 152808
Subject: Reference books on microprocessor design with VHDL
From: VIJAY KUMAR <jvkphysics@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hello, i follow  the book Microprocessor design with VHDL by Enoch
O.Hwang. I want some reference books and some web address on this
topic.

Article: 152809
Subject: FPGA functional flow..please help!
From: vibha <vibha.rao19@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 01:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hallo,

I am new in the world of FPGA. I am asked to design he functional flow
for a image processing hardware. The hardware i.e FPGA will be used
for video decompression . Hence it has to receive the video from the
microcontroller and then execute a decompression algorithm . Now I am
confused as to how the data (image/ video) will be managed by the FPGA
before the decompression algorithm is executed. What are the blocks
required in the functional flow . I am assuming there should be some
functions required for buffering of data (for data in and out).

Can anyone please guide me on how I should go about designing the
functional flow?

Regards.

Article: 152810
Subject: Re: Reference books on microprocessor design with VHDL
From: "RCIngham" <robert.ingham@n_o_s_p_a_m.n_o_s_p_a_m.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:42:39 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
>Hello, i follow  the book Microprocessor design with VHDL by Enoch
>O.Hwang. I want some reference books and some web address on this
>topic.
>
>From a well-known Internet search engine:
http://faculty.lasierra.edu/~ehwang/digitaldesign/
	   
					
---------------------------------------		
Posted through http://www.FPGARelated.com

Article: 152811
Subject: Re: Patent Reform Town Hall Meeting (Balt/Washington Area IEEE
From: fatalist <simfidude@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 06:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Oct 24, 6:20=A0pm, Paul Gotch <pa...@at-cantab-dot.net> wrote:
> In comp.arch.embedded Mark Wills <forthfr...@forthfiles.net> wrote:
>
> > In what have congress changed the law?
>
> The main ones are:
>
> - A move to first to file rather than first to invent (which brings the
> US into line with most of the rest of the world).
>
> - Allowing the USPTOs to set its own fees in a way that in aggregate
> covers its own costs.
>
> - A mechanism to allow thirdparty submission of prior art subsequent to
> publication of the patent.
>
> Unfortunately the bill does almost nothing to combat trolls nor does it
> get rid of the treble damages on wilful infringement setup.
>
> -p
> --
> Paul Gotch
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

** - A move to first to file rather than first to invent (which brings
the
** US into line with most of the rest of the world).

Believe it or not, but we need "first to file": it just makes life
simpler for everybody, including small guys

** - A mechanism to allow thirdparty submission of prior art
subsequent to
** publication of the patent.

I can predict exactly what happens: PTO will be flooded with junk
"third-party" submissions of "prior art" completely irrelevant to
patent claims (There was a bounty prize on invalidating Amazon's "one-
click patent" some years ago which produced tons of junk "prior art"
and not a single invalidating reference)
Poor, poor patent examiners...

** Unfortunately the bill does almost nothing to combat trolls nor
does it
** get rid of the treble damages on wilful infringement setup.

And who are those evil "trolls" ? Have you seen one ?
Are they some PhDs on a loose not employed by corporate monstrosities,
just sitting in their basements and filing evil patents on their own ?
How can you allow this in America ?
Or maybe they are some shrewd investors who buy patents from those PhD
and then use those patents to beat the shit out of fat corporate
infringers ?

And why treble damages for willful  infringement should be removed ?
To encourage willful infrigement ???
I say: make willfull infringement a criminal offense
(Hint: it's awfully hard to prove willful infringement nowadays)


Article: 152812
Subject: Re: FPGA functional flow..please help!
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:35:43 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
vibha <vibha.rao19@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am new in the world of FPGA. I am asked to design he functional flow
> for a image processing hardware. The hardware i.e FPGA will be used
> for video decompression . Hence it has to receive the video from the
> microcontroller and then execute a decompression algorithm . Now I am
> confused as to how the data (image/ video) will be managed by the FPGA
> before the decompression algorithm is executed. What are the blocks
> required in the functional flow . I am assuming there should be some
> functions required for buffering of data (for data in and out).

I presume functional flow means block diagram.

I recommend a systolic array for image processing in FPGA.
The buffering should be done on the microcontroller.  (Which
could be separate, or a soft processor in the FPGA.)  
It will then send data into the systolic array, and extract
results some clock cycles later.  The functional flow/block
diagram will be the successive stages of the decompression
algorithm.

-- glen

Article: 152813
Subject: Re: Patent Reform Town Hall Meeting (Balt/Washington Area IEEE
From: ashtonrsmiller <rmiller@storm.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Oct 25, 9:38=A0am, fatalist <simfid...@gmail.com> wrote:

> ** - A move to first to file rather than first to invent (which brings
> the
> ** US into line with most of the rest of the world).
>
> Believe it or not, but we need "first to file": it just makes life
> simpler for everybody, including small guys
>

Simpler isn't always better. This change makes it possible to patent
work done by someone else, with no recourse for the actual inventor.
What used to be theft is now legal. This certainly will make things
easier for the courts but one obvious consequence is that there will
be increased secrecy surrounding any research that might lead to
patentable developments.

Given the bias toward corporations and globalization displayed by
governments lately, I am deeply suspicious of the motives behind any
change like those made to the patent law.

Article: 152814
Subject: Re: Patent Reform Town Hall Meeting (Balt/Washington Area IEEE
From: Rick <richardcortese@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Oct 24, 3:20=A0pm, Paul Gotch <pa...@at-cantab-dot.net> wrote:
> In comp.arch.embedded Mark Wills <forthfr...@forthfiles.net> wrote:
>
> > In what have congress changed the law?
>
> The main ones are:
>
> - A move to first to file rather than first to invent (which brings the
> US into line with most of the rest of the world).
>
> - Allowing the USPTOs to set its own fees in a way that in aggregate
> covers its own costs.
>
> - A mechanism to allow thirdparty submission of prior art subsequent to
> publication of the patent.
>
> Unfortunately the bill does almost nothing to combat trolls nor does it
> get rid of the treble damages on wilful infringement setup.
>
> -p
> --
> Paul Gotch
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

Unfortunately the underlying system is still bankrupt. Most of the
creative people I know were burned out long ago over the way
corporations treat inventions and patents as just another perk to hand
out to suits. If anything I see the legislation as strengthening the
potential for abuse.

Rick

Article: 152815
Subject: Re: ADC by using counter method on FPGA using VHDL language
From: Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:47:51 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:58:59 -0700, VIJAY KUMAR wrote:

> Hello,i have some idea about vhdl.I want coding  of ADC by using counter
> method on FPGA by using VHDL.. I know the some idea about this program
> the following process.
> a) first reset the counter
> b)the references and analog voltages are equal then gate can be
> closed.then the the value can be stored in the couters i.e., the value
> in counter is equavalent to digital value to analog input.
>  I want coding the above two steps

A single-slope ADC is probably so easy to code that if you know how to 
write the code to use it, the actual ADC logic is trivial.

A dual-slope ADC is nearly so.

So, perhaps you should be inquiring as to how to make a single- or dual-
slope ADC _work_, then just write the code.

-- 
www.wescottdesign.com

Article: 152816
Subject: Re: Peter Alfke has passed away
From: austin <austin@xilinx.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:21:43 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
All,

I (and others) only recently were made aware of Peter's passing.

Xilinx will respond (soon).

We were extremely fortunate to have Peter as an employee, and I am
personally quite sad, as he and I edited each others papers, posts,
and articles.

Not to mention the fun we had here on comp.arch.fpga together.

Austin Lesea



Article: 152817
Subject: Re: Peter Alfke has passed away
From: Mawa_fugo <ccon67@netscape.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Oct 20, 12:33=A0am, Suhaib Fahmy <suh...@fahmy.net> wrote:
> Those who've been on this newsgroup for any period of time will
> remember Peter Alfke, the Xilinx legend, and his infectious
> enthusiasm. He was a great help as I got into FPGA design 8 years ago,
> as I embarked on the academic track. I met him at a number of
> conferences, and he was just as wonderful in person. He gave some real
> life to the newsgroup and has been sorely missed since he stopped
> posting.
>
> A tweet that carried the news:https://twitter.com/xilinxtraining/status/1=
26857481812066304
>
> Our condolences to his family and friends; he will be sorely missed.
>
> Suhaib.

I think he's the only one who wrote poetry in comp.arch.fpga

R.I.P


Article: 152818
Subject: Re: Spartan changes in glitch sensitivity
From: Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:56:32 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 10/24/2011 03:57 PM, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
> Jon Elson<jmelson@wustl.edu>  wrote:
>
> (snip)
>> I know what I was forced to do broke all the digital rules, but it was
>> necessary to make the analog part work.
>
> Maybe not all of them.  While most of the modern rules are based
> on synchronous logic, asynchronous (sometimes called self-timed)
> logic is still around, with its own, different, rules.
Well, when the digital part fires up, I do have a clock, the serial
clock for the shift register.  As long as that is clean (enough), then 
there is no problem.  This design has been working fine since 2004 or so.

Jon

Article: 152819
Subject: Re: Peter Alfke has passed away
From: Tim <tim@bugblatbugblat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 02:08:59 +0100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Very sad, a great loss.

Peter had so many virtues, but I'll remember his generosity. It never 
failed, even when he had to explain metastability for the millionth time.

Article: 152820
Subject: Re: Patent Reform Town Hall Meeting (Balt/Washington Area IEEE
From: rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Oct 25, 10:55=A0am, Rick <richardcort...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 3:20=A0pm, Paul Gotch <pa...@at-cantab-dot.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In comp.arch.embedded Mark Wills <forthfr...@forthfiles.net> wrote:
>
> > > In what have congress changed the law?
>
> > The main ones are:
>
> > - A move to first to file rather than first to invent (which brings the
> > US into line with most of the rest of the world).
>
> > - Allowing the USPTOs to set its own fees in a way that in aggregate
> > covers its own costs.
>
> > - A mechanism to allow thirdparty submission of prior art subsequent to
> > publication of the patent.
>
> > Unfortunately the bill does almost nothing to combat trolls nor does it
> > get rid of the treble damages on wilful infringement setup.
>
> > -p
> > --
> > Paul Gotch
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Unfortunately the underlying system is still bankrupt. Most of the
> creative people I know were burned out long ago over the way
> corporations treat inventions and patents as just another perk to hand
> out to suits. If anything I see the legislation as strengthening the
> potential for abuse.
>
> Rick


So is anyone in the Baltimore/Washington area and willing to
participate in the panel discussion?  This event is being heavily
advertised and we are expecting a good turn out.  Not only will you
get a free lunch, I'll take you kayaking sometime!

Rick

Article: 152821
Subject: Re: ADC by using counter method on FPGA using VHDL language
From: backhus <goouse99@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 25 Okt., 07:58, VIJAY KUMAR <jvkphys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,i have some idea about vhdl.I want coding =A0of ADC by using
> counter method on FPGA by using VHDL.. I know the some idea about this
> program the following process.
> a) first reset the counter
> b)the references and analog voltages are equal then gate can be
> closed.then the the value can be stored in the couters i.e., the value
> in counter is equavalent to digital value to analog input.
> =A0I want coding the above two steps

Hi Vijay,
please read a little about delta sigma ADCs.
Almost every functional element of these can be done in digital logic
and the theory is well described.
Only a analog comparator and a RC-Lowpass (as DAC for the reference
signal) are needed as external devices.

Have a nice synthesis
  Eilert

Article: 152822
Subject: Re: FPGA functional flow..please help!
From: backhus <goouse99@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 25 Okt., 10:20, vibha <vibha.ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I am new in the world of FPGA. I am asked to design he functional flow
> for a image processing hardware. The hardware i.e FPGA will be used
> for video decompression . Hence it has to receive the video from the
> microcontroller and then execute a decompression algorithm . Now I am
> confused as to how the data (image/ video) will be managed by the FPGA
> before the decompression algorithm is executed. What are the blocks
> required in the functional flow . I am assuming there should be some
> functions required for buffering of data (for data in and out).
>
> Can anyone please guide me on how I should go about designing the
> functional flow?
>
> Regards.

Hi,
you should have a look at some application notes first. (e.g those
available from Xilinx)
They even have reference designs that might be useful as a starting
point.

But what is your real intent? Image processing or video decompression?
Or both?
Depending on the answer the best approach for your design will be
different.

To learn about the functional flow, you might read the standards or
specifications of the required algorithms.
Then you need to develop a hardware oriented approach to implement
these functions.
It will be different from the straightforward mathematic formulas or
programming examples because hardware design is based on a different
paradigm.


Have a nice synthesis
  Eilert


Article: 152823
Subject: newable need help
From: jayloveben@hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 04:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
hi all.
im currently learning FPGAs and having big interesting in it. but the
only place i can practice is the uni lab. i wanna practice at home
with my own laptop as well. but i dont know which software should i
download as im using ubuntu10.4 as my OS. any advices and tips? thx :D

Article: 152824
Subject: Re: Patent Reform Town Hall Meeting (Balt/Washington Area IEEE Consultants Network)
From: Paul Gotch <paulg@at-cantab-dot.net>
Date: 26 Oct 2011 13:02:45 +0100 (BST)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
In comp.arch.embedded fatalist <simfidude@gmail.com> wrote:
> Believe it or not, but we need "first to file": it just makes life
> simpler for everybody, including small guys

I'm arguing for first to file.

> I can predict exactly what happens: PTO will be flooded with junk

Um rather than the system being flooded with junk patents which are
massively costly and time consuming to invalidate afterwards? I've much
rather the patents were never awarded in the first place even it it
does mean the PTO have to do a lot of sifting of paper.

> And who are those evil "trolls" ? Have you seen one ?

Yes. However clearly I can't go into details of specific cases. The
system at the moment is setup on the basis of mutally assured
destruction.

A sues B over infringement
B counter sues A over infringment

A and B both produce widgets and their businesses will be adversely
affected if they have to stop shipping widgets. Therfore A and B settle
out of court and sign a cross licensing agreement.

Now C, a 'Patent Troll' doesn't have anything widgets to counter sue
over all they do is litigate until either their patent is invalidated
or they win. The amount of time an money spent on this is such that
for many companies it is cheaper to settle and pay royalties on an
invalid patent than it is to get it overturned.

This is then used as precident to attack other people using the same
patent 'look they licensed it it must be valid' pay up or else.

> And why treble damages for willful  infringement should be removed ?

Because the actual effect of this is that you build something and you
*do not* do any kind of search to see if you need to license anything
and need to pay royalties. If you do do a search and miss something
then it's impossibly hard to prove that you didn't find the patent in
question and aren't willfully infringing it.

-p
-- 
Paul Gotch
--------------------------------------------------------------------



Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search