Site Home Archive Home FAQ Home How to search the Archive How to Navigate the Archive
Compare FPGA features and resources
Threads starting:
Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Hi all, Does anyone know a free/simple software that would use vhdl files to produce a graphical view ? The goal is to have a easier and faster read of the architecture of a vhdl file and its components. Thanks. Stéphane.Article: 124951
Hi St=E9phane, You can use ISE (or not!) from Xilinx, since release 8 you have the possibility to show the schematic equivalent of your hdl, try right mouse button over 'design tools' or similar, after synthesis using XST, then you can browse into the blocks, and so on. I guess that using symplify or other tools you have something equivalent. good luck csb On 12 oct, 10:32, "St=E9phane Julhes" <sjul...@adeneo.adetelgroup.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know a free/simple software that would use vhdl files to prod= uce > a graphical view ? > The goal is to have a easier and faster read of the architecture of a vhdl > file and its components. > > Thanks. > > St=E9phane.Article: 124952
Hi, Thanks for your answer. I saw the RTL viewer but you have to synthesis your design. My goal is to view a simple level of design without providing the source file of each sub component. Which can be quite long for complexe designs. Stéphane. "csantos" <cayetanosantos@gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news: 1192181411.264969.300860@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com... Hi Stéphane, You can use ISE (or not!) from Xilinx, since release 8 you have the possibility to show the schematic equivalent of your hdl, try right mouse button over 'design tools' or similar, after synthesis using XST, then you can browse into the blocks, and so on. I guess that using symplify or other tools you have something equivalent. good luck csb On 12 oct, 10:32, "Stéphane Julhes" <sjul...@adeneo.adetelgroup.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know a free/simple software that would use vhdl files to > produce > a graphical view ? > The goal is to have a easier and faster read of the architecture of a vhdl > file and its components. > > Thanks. > > Stéphane.Article: 124953
Ok, thanks for the info. So I think I should use Class II for data lines (two 50 ohm terminations connected to Vtt, at both ends), and Class I (one 50 ohm termination connected to Vtt, at the receiver) for all the others ; and use the on-chip 25 ohm series resistors at the FPGA, and the 25- ohm series resistors included on my DDRAM module. No additional termination is required for clock lines (except the FPGA's on chip series resistor) as these differential signals already have a 120 ohm resistor across them on the DDRAM module. Is that correct (given the price of 4-layer prototype boards and the difficulty in reworking BGA packages, I'd like to be absolutely certain) ?Article: 124954
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I just got an email from Altera, saying: > > ear Altera Customer, > > The new Quartus® II Web Edition Software version 7.2 is now available > for download. > New features include: > > [...blah...] > * Get complete OS support for Linux in addition to 64-bit Windows > Vista > > However, on the download page they still have: > > For Solaris or Linux support, purchase an Altera software subscription. > > Anyone knows what the deal is? Doesn't Altera make use of the MainWin runtime environment to allow their tools to run on Linux or Solaris? If so, then they cannot give away free copies of their own Altera tools on Linux without having to pay royalties to MainSoft. I have no real proof that this is the case, but it sounds plausible to me. That doesn't mean I like it. Hell no, I really wish they would develop native Linux tools. -- KeesArticle: 124955
On Oct 12, 9:32 am, "SJU" <sjul...@adeneo.adetelgroup.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We are building a very simple SOC ( PPC 405, internal memory, UART light)= in > a V4FX60, with a very simple firmware. > The point is that when we use the PLB_BRAM memory, the GDB debugger works > fine, but wneh we use the OCM memories, the debugger behaves in astrange > way. When we download the file then it goes in a assembly state and execu= tes > nothing, I guess it went in some exceptions or executed some unexpected > instructions. > > Is there something to know to use the OCM memories ? > Are there some configuration to make in EDK ? > > Thanks for your help. > > St=E9phane. Hello Stephane. How do you write to the OCM Bram? i am using a VHDL file in the PORTB. probably i dont write in the correct location. But the simulation is strange to me also. Dont forget if you are using port B to set the clk to sys_clk_pin and the Reset to sys_bus_rst. regardsArticle: 124956
Stéphane Julhes wrote: > I saw the RTL viewer but you have to synthesis your design. > My goal is to view a simple level of design without providing the source > file of each sub component. I use the quartus rtl viewer. example: http://home.comcast.net/~mike_treseler/uart.pdf If I synthesize a structural entity with null architectures, I get just the top level block diagram. -- Mike TreselerArticle: 124957
On Oct 12, 11:32 am, "St=E9phane Julhes" <sjul...@adeneo.adetelgroup.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know a free/simple software that would use vhdl files to prod= uce > a graphical view ? > The goal is to have a easier and faster read of the architecture of a vhdl > file and its components. > > Thanks. > > St=E9phane. There are Advanced Dataflow Viewer in Aldec Active-HDL and Dataflow Viewer in ModelSim. But they are not free. They are both pretty similar, after compiling the design you can browse its graphical representation consisting of architectures, processes, ports and connections. You can also use Dataflow Viewer for debugging during simulation. Advanced Dataflow demo from Aldec: http://www.aldec.com/products/active-hdl/multimediademo/movies/advanced_dat= aflow/Article: 124958
On Oct 11, 10:51 am, Duane Clark <junkm...@junkmail.com> wrote: > fpgabuilder wrote: > > > There may be other issues with you design, but to solve your immediate > > problem you can declare the 40MHz clock a separate clock/timing group. > > Yes, that is what I said in my first post in this thread ;) Sorry! I missed that.Article: 124959
On 10=D4=C212=C8=D5, =CF=C2=CE=E74=CA=B132=B7=D6, "St=A8=A6phane Julhes" <s= jul...@adeneo.adetelgroup.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know a free/simple software that would use vhdl files to prod= uce > a graphical view ? > The goal is to have a easier and faster read of the architecture of a vhdl > file and its components. > > Thanks. > > St=A8=A6phane. you can try FPGA Advantage, it's mentor product. I use this for develop for years and it's very easy for generate graphic VHDL.Article: 124960
On 10 10 , 4 50 , "Ju, Jian" <ee...@polyu.edu.hk> wrote: > Hi all, > > I meet some problems in the P&R process of my design. > > The Place & Route Report shows the following messages. Because it stoped at > Phase 6 for a long time, I paused it and it shows there's 1 net unrouted. > > ----------------- Place & Route Report ------------------------ > Phase 6: 2645 unrouted; (0) REAL time: 17 secs > > Ctrl-C interrupt detected. > > Please choose one of the following options: > 1. Ignore interrupt and continue processing. > 2. Exit program normally at next checkpoint. > This will save the best results so far > after concluding the current processing. > 3. Exit program immediately. > 4. Cancel the current job and move to the next one > at the next check point. > > Enter choice --> 2 > User requested termination > Phase 7: 1 unrouted; (0) REAL time: 3 mins 2 secs > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I opened the ncd file and shows the Unrouted Nets visually. I changed the > position of one of the SLICE and then it automatically re-route. The > previously Unrouted Nets dissapered and are no longer listed. > > But I'm not completely sure that all of the nets have been routed properly, > because in the following step, Generated Programming File, it complains that > ERROR:PhysDesignRules:801 - The network <digital_inst/inst1/fir1/N42592> has > <1> routing conflicts. > ERROR:PhysDesignRules:801 - The network <digital_inst/inst1/fir1/N42591> has > <1> routing conflicts. > ERROR:Bitgen:25 - DRC detected 2 errors and 24 warnings. > > I checked the ncd file again in the FPGA Editor, however, it seems these two > nets have already been routed. what is "the routing conflicts" meant to? Any > possible solutions? > > I would appreciated your help, > Ju, Jian maybe what you need to do is run generate program file againArticle: 124961
"Stéphane Julhes" <sjulhes@adeneo.adetelgroup.com> wrote: >Hi all, > >Does anyone know a free/simple software that would use vhdl files to produce >a graphical view ? >The goal is to have a easier and faster read of the architecture of a vhdl >file and its components. doxygen? -- Reply to nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.) Bedrijven en winkels vindt U op www.adresboekje.nlArticle: 124962
I'm working with XILINX ise 9.2i; designing a deserializer & using 2 DCM's in sequence to generate 4 100MHz clocks (each 90 degrees out of phase) from the 50MHz local clock on a Spartan-3 FPGA The error i'm getting: ERROR:NgdBuild:455 - logical net 'CLK100X' has multiple driver(s): pin CLK2X on block clockdoubler/DCM_INST with type DCM, pin PAD on block CLK100X with type PAD regarding the following code: dcm1 clockdoubler ( .CLKIN_IN(CLKIN), //50MHz local spartan-3 clock .RST_IN(RST), .CLKIN_IBUFG_OUT(CLKIN_IBUFG_OUT1), .CLK0_OUT(CLK0), .CLK2X_OUT(CLK100X), //100MHz clock out .LOCKED_OUT(LOCKED1) ); dcm2 clockseparater ( .CLKIN_IN(CLK100X), //100MHz input .RST_IN(LOCKED1), .CLKIN_IBUFG_OUT(CLKIN_IBUFG_OUT2), .CLK0_OUT(CLK100A), //0 phase diff .CLK90_OUT(CLK100B), //90 deg .CLK180_OUT(CLK100C), //180 deg .CLK270_OUT(CLK100D), //270 deg .LOCKED_OUT(LOCKED2), .STATUS_OUT(STATUS2) ); For the i changed the buffered output of the first DCM to be "local routing" instead of a global buf, which i know can cause this same error message, but im still getting the error... i have no idea whats wrong with it, any help would be greatly appreciated! ThanksArticle: 124963
Kees Bakker wrote: > > Doesn't Altera make use of the MainWin runtime environment to allow their tools to > run on Linux or Solaris? If so, then they cannot give away free copies of their > own Altera tools on Linux without having to pay royalties to MainSoft. > > I have no real proof that this is the case, but it sounds plausible to me. That doesn't > mean I like it. Hell no, I really wish they would develop native Linux tools. > That has certainly been the case in the past (although only for the GUI tools -- the CLI tools worked just fine without.) I was hoping that the announcement meant they had fixed that (after all, Xilinx already cleaned that up.) There are some really good cross-platform development environments without the issues of MainWin; Qt comes to mind. -hpaArticle: 124964
<lzkelley@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1192215300.249202.47690@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com... > I'm working with XILINX ise 9.2i; designing a deserializer & using 2 > DCM's in sequence to generate 4 100MHz clocks (each 90 degrees out of > phase) from the 50MHz local clock on a Spartan-3 FPGA > > The error i'm getting: > > ERROR:NgdBuild:455 - logical net 'CLK100X' has multiple driver(s): > pin CLK2X on block clockdoubler/DCM_INST with type DCM, > pin PAD on block CLK100X with type PAD > > regarding the following code: > > dcm1 clockdoubler ( > .CLKIN_IN(CLKIN), //50MHz local spartan-3 clock > .RST_IN(RST), > .CLKIN_IBUFG_OUT(CLKIN_IBUFG_OUT1), > .CLK0_OUT(CLK0), > .CLK2X_OUT(CLK100X), //100MHz clock out > .LOCKED_OUT(LOCKED1) > ); > > > dcm2 clockseparater ( > .CLKIN_IN(CLK100X), //100MHz input > .RST_IN(LOCKED1), > .CLKIN_IBUFG_OUT(CLKIN_IBUFG_OUT2), > .CLK0_OUT(CLK100A), //0 phase diff > .CLK90_OUT(CLK100B), //90 deg > .CLK180_OUT(CLK100C), //180 deg > .CLK270_OUT(CLK100D), //270 deg > .LOCKED_OUT(LOCKED2), > .STATUS_OUT(STATUS2) > ); > > For the > i changed the buffered output of the first DCM to be "local routing" > instead of a global buf, which i know can cause this same error > message, but im still getting the error... i have no idea whats wrong > with it, any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks Read the message carefully. It appears that you have another item (an input, perhaps) called CLK100X. If you have that input *and* the DCM both generating a signal called CLK100X, you'll have a conflict. If you search your code for all instances of that name, you might find a forgotten signal.Article: 124965
I've been scouring the newsgroups for DRAM discussions and I ran into several that discussed the timing even over "short" distances. I'm trying to design a DRAM controller to write/read a pattern to DRAM at 18-20 inches. I'm having problems with the controller right now, but am I wasting my time? It has to be DRAM b/c we are testing the devices for a radiation environment. I was thinking of running it at ~10-20Mhz. Thanks, EricArticle: 124966
No, it seems you still have to pay $2000 more if you want to use Linux and stay legal. Altera sucks.Article: 124967
If I have the web edition license, is it still possible to use the SOPC builder? I'm just trying to build one of the projects in the tutorial... Thanks, Eric ------------------------ This is the error I get ------------------------ Altera SOPC Builder Version 7.00 Build 33 Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Altera Corporation. All rights reserved. # 2007.10.13 04:40:11 (*) mk_custom_sdk starting # 2007.10.13 04:40:11 (*) Reading project F:/fpga_stuff/dram_system_sopc/nios_system.ptf. # 2007.10.13 04:40:12 (*) Finding all CPUs # 2007.10.13 04:40:12 (*) Finding all available components # 2007.10.13 04:40:12 (*) Reading F:/fpga_stuff/dram_system_sopc/.sopc_builder/install.ptf # 2007.10.13 04:40:12 (*) Found 67 components # 2007.10.13 04:40:13 (*) Finding all peripherals # 2007.10.13 04:40:13 (*) Finding software components # 2007.10.13 04:40:13 (*) (Legacy SDK Generation Skipped) # 2007.10.13 04:40:13 (*) (All TCL Script Generation Skipped) # 2007.10.13 04:40:13 (*) (No Libraries Built) # 2007.10.13 04:40:13 (*) (Contents Generation Skipped) # 2007.10.13 04:40:13 (*) mk_custom_sdk finishing # 2007.10.13 04:40:13 (*) Starting generation for system: nios_system. .. # 2007.10.13 04:40:15 (*) Running Generator Program for cpu_0 # 2007.10.13 04:40:17 (*) Checking for plaintext license. # 2007.10.13 04:40:17 (*) Plaintext license not found. # 2007.10.13 04:40:17 (*) Checking for encrypted license (non-evaluation). # 2007.10.13 04:40:18 (*) Encrypted license not found. Defaulting to OCP evaluation license (produces a time-limited SOF) ERROR: In object '' of class e_process: can't access `user_attributes_names' field known fields are: _AUTOLOAD_ACCEPT_ALL _asynchronous_contents _built _clock _contents _creation_history _object_list _order _parent_set _project_set _reset _reset_default _signal_list _vhdl_files _vhdl_fixes _vhdl_variables clock_level comment indent isa_dummy name output_as_muxes_and_registers paragraph reset_level sensitivity_list known pointers are: _parent _project keys: _AUTOLOAD_ACCEPT_ALL _permitted _pointers by the way, this object is a dummy Error: Generator program for module 'cpu_0' did NOT run successfully. generator cmd was 'c:/altera/70/quartus//bin/perl/bin/perl -Ic:/altera/70/quartus/sopc_builder/bin -Ic:/altera/70/quartus/sopc_builder/bin/europa -Ic:/altera/70/quartus/sopc_builder/bin/perl_lib -I. -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios2 -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_pio -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_custom_instr_interrupt_vector -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_custom_instruction -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_onchip_memory2 -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_onchip_memory -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_mutex -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_burst_adapter -IC:/altera/72/ip/pci_express_compiler/lib/sopc_builder/altera_avalon_pcie_compiler_adapter -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_cf -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_spi -IC:/altera/72/ip/pci_compiler/lib/sopc_builder/altera_avalon_pci_compiler -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_user_defined_interface -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_pipeline_bridge -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_dev_board_stratix_2s60_rohs -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_custom_instr_bitswap -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_sopc_builder -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_cfi_flash -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_pll -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_sgdma -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_custom_instr_floating_point -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_epcs_flash_controller -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_adapter_upstream_pipeline -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_dev_kit_stratix_edition_sram -IC:/altera/72/ip/triple_speed_ethernet/lib/sopc_builder/altera_triple_speed_ethernet -IC:/altera/72/ip/pci_express_compiler/lib/sopc_builder/altera_avalon_pcie_compiler -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_lan91c111 -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_dev_kit_stratix_edition_sram2 -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_adapter_downstream_pipeline -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_dev_board_stratix_1s40 -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_uart -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_new_sdram_controller -IC:/altera/72/ip/ddr2_high_perf/lib/sopc_builder/ddr2_high_perf -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_adapter_waitrequest_pipeline -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_adapter_slave_y -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_clock_adapter -IC:/altera/72/ip/pci_compiler/lib/sopc_builder/altera_avalon_pci_compiler_adapter -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_mailbox -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_asmi -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/amd_avalon_am29lv065d_flash -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_lcd_16207 -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_custom_instr_endian_converter -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_jtag_uart -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_adapter_master_y -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_endian_adapter -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_dev_board_cyclone_1c20 -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_dev_board_stratix_1s10_es -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_tri_state_bridge -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_dev_board_cyclone_2c35 -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/no_legacy_module -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/amd_avalon_am29lv128m_flash -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_cy7c1380_ssram -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios2 -IC:/altera/72/ip/ddr_ddr2_sdram/lib/sopc_builder/ddr_sdram_component -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_cs8900 -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_performance_counter -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_sysid -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_fifo -IC:/altera/72/ip/ddr_high_perf/lib/sopc_builder/ddr_high_perf -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_dev_board_stratix_2s60_es -IC:/altera/72/ip/ddr_ddr2_sdram/lib/sopc_builder/ddr2_sdram_component -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_timer -IC:/altera/72/ip/ddr3_high_perf/lib/sopc_builder/ddr3_high_perf -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_multiply -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_dma -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_dev_board_stratix_1s10 -IC:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip/altera_avalon_clock_crossing -IC:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios_dev_board_stratix_2s60 C:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios2/cpu_core_select.pl --system_name=nios_system --target_module_name=cpu_0 --system_directory=F:/fpga_stuff/dram_system_sopc --sopc_directory=c:/altera/70/quartus/sopc_builder --sopc_lib_path=F:/fpga_stuff/dram_system_sopc+C:/altera/72/ip/pci_express_compiler/lib/sopc_builder+C:/altera/72/ip/ddr3_high_perf/lib/sopc_builder+C:/altera/72/ip/ddr2_high_perf/lib/sopc_builder+C:/altera/72/ip/ddr_high_perf/lib/sopc_builder+C:/altera/72/ip/sopc_builder_ip+C:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip+C:/altera/72/ip/triple_speed_ethernet/lib/sopc_builder+C:/altera/72/ip/pci_compiler/lib/sopc_builder+C:/altera/72/ip/ddr_ddr2_sdram/lib/sopc_builder+c:/altera/70/quartus/sopc_builder/components --generate=1 --verbose=0 --software_only=0 --module_lib_dir=C:/altera/72/ip/nios2_ip/altera_nios2 --sopc_quartus_dir=c:/altera/70/quartus/ --projectname=dram_system.quartus' Error in processing. System NOT successfully generated.Article: 124968
Hi, There is a simple solution, just use the 'black_box' constraint applied to your top lovel blocks, you can synthetize without needing to provide the code of the components, this will create a schematic of the top level, does it help? csb On 12 oct, 12:44, "St=E9phane Julhes" <sjul...@adeneo.adetelgroup.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your answer. > > I saw the RTL viewer but you have to synthesis your design. > My goal is to view a simple level of design without providing the source > file of each sub component. > Which can be quite long for complexe designs. > > St=E9phane. > > "csantos" <cayetanosan...@gmail.com> a =E9crit dans le message de news: > 1192181411.264969.300...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > Hi St=E9phane, > > You can use ISE (or not!) from Xilinx, since release 8 you have > the possibility to show the schematic equivalent of your hdl, try > right mouse button over 'design tools' or similar, after synthesis > using XST, then you can browse into the blocks, and so on. I guess > that using symplify or other tools you have something equivalent. > > good luck > > csb > > On 12 oct, 10:32, "St=E9phane Julhes" <sjul...@adeneo.adetelgroup.com> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > Does anyone know a free/simple software that would use vhdl files to > > produce > > a graphical view ? > > The goal is to have a easier and faster read of the architecture of a v= hdl > > file and its components. > > > Thanks. > > > St=E9phane.Article: 124969
Hi i 'm trying to practice VHDL at home,until today i did some things using obsolete Lattice and Xilinx CPLD. One year ago i bought a Spartan educational board from Digilent with a programming cable included,so i can program obsolete Virtex FPGAs via JTAG and this could be enough for educational purposes. Now i would like to implement some kind of self programming at power-on,for Xilinx Virtex. I know the somepossible methods are : Flash memory via microcontroller ,the problem is how can i program the Flash itself? Specific memory in master serial mode,are they available by distributor as Rs or Farnell in Italy? EEprom via CPLD as shown in www.xilinx.com/bvdocs/appnotes/xapp137.pdf What do you suggest? Thanks diegoArticle: 124970
Thanks Gary, Bob, Laurent, Parag, sk, & John for your comments. That is much appreciated. Gary, thanks. Wow, it's cool that you have bit-banged JTAG and have obviously tackled interconnect testing before. Thanks Bob for the Corelis recommendation. A friend of mine here in Sydney uses Corelis. Definitely the higher-end and powerful stuff. I couldn't find any prices on their site but I belive it's expensive, as Parag also mentioned. Thanks Laurent, UniversalScan looks good. I didn't know that J-Scan was a licensed version of UniversalScan, but now that I look at their websites again I can see it. The possibility of storing SVF output format with that tool looks nice. I note from their website that the price of UniversalScan is US$845. Also, Laurent, by the way I really like the look of JTAGkey. Very nice product. I will have to get myself one of those:)...but just at the moment I am pretty happy with my parallel port Xilinx, Altera & Lattice cables. I also like that JTAGkey works with Scanseer (I am a fan of Scanseer:) ) & and other JTAG software. sk, that's interesting about Scanseer being faster than UniversalScan, in terms of samples per second. Definitely I love the waveform viewer in Scanseer. I also like that you can slow down the sample rate with Scanseer if you want to. I do that when I just need to look at DC levels (it still gives me some indication that the clock and other signals are toggling). A few samples per second is good enough for that, but the higher sample rate is essential for other tests. Scanseer's price is Euro$150, which is less than US$220. Great value. Thanks John for the onTAP Flynn Systems pointer. That does look good. I note from their website the price starts at about $2,895. Just to expand the list a little, I have also looked at the websites for: xjtag acculogic intellitech jtag technologies Guys, I am writing an ebook & videos on low-cost JTAG interconnect testing. This is a resource for those that want to do simple interconnect testing on a prototype board (with BGAs etc.), but can't justify spending much on tools or time. For example, for a small company, freelance designer, or hobbyist that does not do alot of development and has a limited budget. I guess there aren't alot of hobbyists buying Corelis:) I have some valuable tips, tricks and techniques that I have found and developed that I would like to offer. If there's anything that you would like to see in an ebook like this, please drop me a line. I would really apprecate it. I will release the ebook & videos soon at http://www.TestBGAsoldering.com Thanks & cheers, Tony Burch "Tony Burch" <tony@burched.com.au> wrote in message news:47097d29$0$18984$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > Hi, > I am looking at various alternatives for interconnect testing, especially > for prototype boards that have BGAs. I am very interested to know what > other people are using for JTAG interconnect testing, and what your > debugging experiences are? > > I have Scanseer, and I like it very much. I can do some interconnect > testing and real-time monitoring with Scanseer. Another one out there is > JSCAN from Macraigor Systems. I have not used JSCAN. The test script > recorder stores in SVF looks like it could be good. > > Does anyone do prototype interconnect testing with: > * Amontec JTAGkey? > * the Lattice tools - ispVM? > > Any other suggestions or experiences with interconnect testing (besides > X-ray:) )? > > Thanks & cheers, > Tony BurchArticle: 124971
Sebastien Bourdeauducq wrote: > No, it seems you still have to pay $2000 more if you want to use Linux > and stay legal. That includes oem modelsim and the rtl and state viewers. I'd call that a bargain. -- Mike TreselerArticle: 124972
So I thought I would try out this MIG thing I see mentioned occasionally, But according to http://www.xilinx.com/xlnx/xil_ans_display.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&getPagePath=25406 Software Requirements - ISE 9.2.01i - Windows XP (32 bit) So is MIG really windows only? I currently have ISE 8.2. That same page says: - MIG is no longer provided as a separate download, but is now incorporated into IP Updates. MIG v1.73 is available through 9.2i IP Update 1. So does anyone know if older versions of MIG are available somewhere (I have not been able to find them)? Does it run under Wine maybe? Is it worth bothering with (I am specifically interested in a plain DDR interface)?Article: 124973
On Oct 13, 1:30 am, Sebastien Bourdeauducq <sebastien.bourdeaud...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, it seems you still have to pay $2000 more if you want to use Linux > and stay legal. > Altera sucks. Sebastien, can I have your car? No? Well, you suck! Seriously, a more constructive discussion here might be what the state of running Quartus II under Wine is. I gather that some have succeeded. I regularly run Quartus II in a WinXP VM on my Mac (using VMware Fusion). I tried to install Quartus II 7.1sp1 Web Ed. with CrossOver 6.1 in a Win2K bottle, but alas the installation hung. Personally I'd care more about having a version that worked under Wine/ CrossOver than a native Linux port. My $0.0145, TommyArticle: 124974
On Oct 12, 1:32 am, "St=E9phane Julhes" <sjul...@adeneo.adetelgroup.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know a free/simple software that would use vhdl files to prod= uce > a graphical view ? > The goal is to have a easier and faster read of the architecture of a vhdl > file and its components. > > Thanks. > > St=E9phane. I'd like to mention Lattice HDL Explorer. As far as I understand it's exactly the thing you're looking for. It's not exactly free, it's part of Lattice tool ispLever. The tools aren't too expensive and also you'll be able to get a 60 days free evaluation if you'd like, just contact Lattice local person for this. Hope this helps, Alex Y.
Site Home Archive Home FAQ Home How to search the Archive How to Navigate the Archive
Compare FPGA features and resources
Threads starting:
Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z